How does closing arguments work in criminal cases?

They do this by explaining how the evidence supports their theory of the case and clarifying to the jury any issues they must resolve in order to reach a verdict. A final argument, summary, or summary is the final statement by each party's lawyer in which arguments important to the evaluator of the facts, often the jury, are reiterated in a court case. As I mentioned above, the prosecutor speaks twice in a closing argument, so he has the opportunity to refute the defense lawyer's conclusion. In a criminal law case, the prosecution will reaffirm all the evidence that helps prove each element of the crime.

You will be scored in a mock trial based on how well your closing argument incorporates what actually happened in the trial. The defense lawyer argued that it's not uncommon for a person to have a life insurance policy for their spouse. Fundamentally, when writing your closing argument, you must remember that you, as a prosecutor, have the burden of proof. The lawyer reiterates the important arguments, summarizes what the evidence has demonstrated and what has not, and asks the jury to consider the evidence and apply the law in favor of his client.

The lawyer's final arguments or summaries discuss the evidence and inferences duly drawn. France or Germany), in criminal cases, the defendant's lawyer always makes his closing argument the last, after the prosecutor or any other party. The judge usually tells lawyers before the closing arguments begin what instructions he intends to give to the jury. Closing arguments are an opportunity for each party to remind jurors of the main evidence presented and to convince them to adopt an interpretation favorable to their position.

Unlike an opening statement, which you can write well in advance of the trial, a closing argument requires you to think quickly. During the closing arguments, the lawyer cannot (among other restrictions) guarantee the credibility of the witnesses, indicate their personal opinions on the case, comment on the absence of evidence that they themselves have made that excluded them, or attempt to urge the jury to adopt emotional and irrational behavior. In their closing arguments, lawyers can comment on the jury's instructions and relate them to the evidence.

Leave Message

Required fields are marked *